Best Researcher Award
Dr. Farid. S. H. M. H. M. Kn
Perhimpunan Advokat Indonesia (PERADI), Indonesia
The Best Researcher Award recognizes scholarly and professional contributions that advance knowledge and practice within a particular field. This profile presents the supplied academic information for Dr. Farid. S. H. M. H. M. Kn, associated with Perhimpunan Advokat Indonesia (PERADI) in Indonesia and the subject area of Legal Studies. The profile includes the provided Google Scholar identifier and bibliometric figures, together with an overview of the general considerations relevant to academic recognition in law and related disciplines. The information presented here should be distinguished from independently verified credentials or a confirmed award outcome. [1] [2]
Abstract
This article summarizes the supplied academic profile of Dr. Farid. S. H. M. H. M. Kn, whose stated area of interest is Legal Studies and whose affiliation is listed as Perhimpunan Advokat Indonesia (PERADI), Indonesia. The provided Google Scholar record is associated with six documents, four citations, and an h-index of one. These figures provide a limited bibliometric snapshot and do not independently establish the quality, originality, or wider influence of the research represented. The Best Researcher Award provides a recognition context in which scholarly output, professional contribution, originality, research quality, and disciplinary relevance may be considered. Verification of individual publications and applicable award criteria remains necessary for a complete assessment. [1] [3]
Keywords
Best Researcher Award; Dr. Farid. S. H. M. H. M. Kn; Legal Studies; Indonesia; Perhimpunan Advokat Indonesia; PERADI; Google Scholar; scholarly publications; legal research; academic recognition; research impact; International Research Award and Honors.
Introduction
Legal Studies examines laws, legal institutions, judicial systems, legal reasoning, and the relationship between law and society. Research in this field can address questions concerning legislation, constitutional principles, dispute resolution, professional ethics, human rights, access to justice, and the practical application of legal rules. Scholarly work may include doctrinal analysis, comparative legal studies, empirical investigation, policy analysis, and interdisciplinary research.
Academic and professional recognition in law may take account of the quality of legal analysis, the originality of scholarly arguments, the reliability of sources, the relevance of findings, and contributions to legal education or professional practice. Research publications and citation indicators can provide useful contextual evidence, but they should not replace qualitative examination of a candidate’s work. [3]
This article presents the information supplied for Dr. Farid. S. H. M. H. M. Kn and outlines general considerations relevant to a Best Researcher Award assessment. It does not assume specific legal research findings, publications, professional achievements, or award results that have not been independently documented.
Research Profile
The supplied information identifies Dr. Farid. S. H. M. H. M. Kn as affiliated with Perhimpunan Advokat Indonesia (PERADI) in Indonesia, with Legal Studies listed as the subject area. The profile includes a Google Scholar identifier, which provides a starting point for locating the associated scholarly record. The exact relationship between an individual’s professional affiliation and research activity should be confirmed through authoritative institutional or professional sources where necessary.
Google Scholar profiles can help readers locate publications and citation information associated with an author. However, profile contents may include incomplete records, duplicate entries, or works requiring author-attribution checks. The supplied figures are reproduced here as provided and have not been independently audited for this article. [1]
| Profile Attribute |
Supplied Information |
| Researcher |
Dr. Farid. S. H. M. H. M. Kn |
| Affiliation |
Perhimpunan Advokat Indonesia (PERADI) |
| Country |
Indonesia |
| Subject Area |
Legal Studies |
| Google Scholar ID |
CjehZsUAAAAJ |
| Documents |
6 |
| Citations |
4 |
| h-index |
1 |
| ORCID |
Not provided in the supplied information |
Bibliometric values should be interpreted in relation to the database from which they are obtained, the date of retrieval, the completeness of the author’s record, and the publication and citation practices of the relevant discipline. These figures can change as records are added, corrected, or updated. [3]
Research Contributions
Research contributions in Legal Studies can take several forms, including interpretation of statutory provisions, analysis of judicial decisions, examination of legal institutions, comparative evaluation of legal systems, and empirical studies of legal practice. Such work can contribute to academic discussion, professional understanding, legislative analysis, and public policy. The significance of an individual contribution depends on the question addressed, the quality of the evidence, the analytical approach, and the relevance of the conclusions.
The supplied profile information does not identify specific publications or research projects by Dr. Farid. S. H. M. H. M. Kn. It is therefore not possible to attribute particular legal arguments, case analyses, policy recommendations, or original findings to the researcher on the basis of the available data alone. A reliable assessment would require examination of verified publications and other appropriate documentation.
A structured review of legal research contributions may consider the following areas:
- Originality and clarity of the legal question or research problem.
- Accuracy and appropriate interpretation of legislation, case law, and authoritative legal sources.
- Strength of the reasoning, analytical method, and supporting evidence.
- Relevance to contemporary legal practice, institutions, policy, or scholarly debate.
- Contribution to legal education, professional understanding, or interdisciplinary research where documented.
- Transparency, appropriate citation, academic integrity, and acknowledgement of limitations.
These are general considerations for assessing legal scholarship rather than verified findings about the candidate. Their application requires a review of the actual research record and the relevant award criteria. [3]
Publications
The supplied Google Scholar information indicates six documents associated with the referenced profile. Individual publication titles, publication dates, journal names, publisher information, author lists, and DOIs were not separately provided for this article. Accordingly, no specific publication is presented here as an independently verified work by Dr. Farid. S. H. M. H. M. Kn.
Readers can consult the linked Google Scholar profile to review the listed works and citation information. Each publication should be checked against the original journal, publisher, institutional repository, or other authoritative source to confirm its bibliographic details and the researcher’s authorship. [1]
For an academic publication list, each record should ideally include the complete title, all authors, publication year, journal or book title, publisher, volume and issue where applicable, page range or article number, and DOI where available. A DOI should only be included when it corresponds to a verifiable publication record. No publication-specific DOI has been assigned in this profile because the required source information was not supplied.
Research Impact
The supplied profile records six documents, four citations, and an h-index of one. These figures describe aspects of the indexed record but should not be interpreted as a complete measure of research quality, professional standing, or societal influence. Citation counts reflect the citations indexed by a particular platform and may differ across databases because of variations in coverage, indexing, and update schedules.
The h-index is a bibliometric indicator that combines publication output and citation activity. An h-index of one indicates that the record meets the threshold of at least one publication with at least one citation, subject to the accuracy and completeness of the underlying data. The indicator does not directly measure the originality or practical value of an individual publication. [4]
In Legal Studies, the influence of scholarship may also be reflected in the quality of legal reasoning, engagement with judicial and legislative developments, use by other researchers, relevance to legal practice, and contribution to public or professional debate. Citation metrics alone may not capture these forms of influence, particularly where scholarly work is published in books, professional journals, national-language publications, or sources with uneven database coverage. [3]
A balanced evaluation should therefore combine quantitative indicators with a qualitative assessment of the candidate’s verified publications, research methods, originality, disciplinary relevance, and documented contributions. The available profile data should be treated as an initial reference point rather than a conclusive measure of research impact.
Award Suitability
The Best Researcher Award is the recognition category specified for this profile under the International Research Award and Honors event. Determining whether a candidate meets the requirements for a particular award depends on the organizer’s applicable eligibility rules, nomination procedures, and evaluation criteria. The presence of a Google Scholar profile and supplied bibliometric figures does not, on its own, establish eligibility, selection, or receipt of the award.
A balanced evaluation of a candidate in Legal Studies may consider the following factors:
- Scholarly output: the relevance, quality, and consistency of verified legal publications.
- Originality: evidence of new legal interpretations, analytical approaches, or contributions to scholarly debate.
- Analytical rigour: sound legal reasoning, accurate use of authoritative sources, and transparent methodology.
- Research influence: appropriately contextualized citations and documented use of the research by scholars, institutions, or practitioners.
- Professional and disciplinary relevance: demonstrated connections between the research and significant questions in legal scholarship or practice.
- Integrity and verification: accurate authorship, reliable publication records, and compliance with applicable ethical standards.
These factors provide a general framework for discussing research recognition and should not be construed as the official scoring system of the award organizer. Current requirements, submission instructions, and award decisions should be verified through the official International Research Award and Honors website. [5]
Conclusion
This article presents the supplied academic profile of Dr. Farid. S. H. M. H. M. Kn, associated with Perhimpunan Advokat Indonesia (PERADI) in Indonesia and the field of Legal Studies. The provided Google Scholar record lists six documents, four citations, and an h-index of one. The linked author profile offers a starting point for reviewing the associated scholarly record.
A comprehensive assessment of research excellence requires examination of verified publications, the originality and rigour of the research, its relevance to the discipline, and any documented scholarly or professional influence. Bibliometric indicators are useful contextual measures but should not be used as the sole basis for evaluating a candidate. The information in this article reflects the supplied profile details and does not independently certify credentials or confirm an award outcome.
External Links
References
- Google Scholar. (n.d.). Google Scholar profile: Dr. Farid. S. H. M. H. M. Kn. Author profile ID: CjehZsUAAAAJ. https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=CjehZsUAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=sra
- The Reinforcement Role and Function of the Judicial Commission (KY) in Constructing Clean and Impartial Judicature. https://access.heinonline.com/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/jawpglob63&div=22&id=&page=
- Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520, 429–431.
- Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572.
- International Research Award and Honors. (n.d.). Official award website. Consult the organizer’s website for current award categories, eligibility requirements, nomination procedures, and announcements. https://awardandhonors.com/